Holders Steer the Direction
The Vote
The big LAND Fund calls aren't made without you. They're put to the holders — weighted by patience, signed without risk.
"The longer you've held, the more your voice weighs — not your wallet size on the day of the vote, but your patience over time. And you never take a risk to be heard: you sign a message, never a transaction. Your tokens never move, never leave your hands, and the project never touches them."
The Principle
Patience-Score Voting, Solana Wallet Signatures
Weighted by Patience
Your vote carries the weight of your Patience Score at an announced snapshot date — tokens × days held, plus the never-sold bonus. Long-term holders steer; flash-in, flash-out wallets barely register.
Signed, Not Spent
You approve a choice by signing a plain-language message with your Solana wallet (an ed25519 message signature, e.g. Phantom's signMessage). It's a signature, not a transaction — gasless, free, and re-castable until the snapshot closes.
Your Tokens Don't Move
No approval, no transfer, no contract call ever touches your balance. Your $LOAM stays exactly where it is. A message signature cannot move funds — and The Vote will never ask you to sign a transaction.
🛠️ How the signature works — for the technically curious
- You sign a structured plain-text message — a small human-readable JSON payload (a
domainofsanctumelysium.com, theproposalId, yourchoice, your voterpubkey, atimestamp) that your wallet renders in full before you approve, following the Sign-In-With-Solana (SIWS) convention. We will never ask you to sign a raw hex blob — if you ever see one, it's not us. - The message binds to a
domainand carries a uniqueproposalIdplus your ownpubkey— so a signature for one vote can't be reused on another vote or on another site, and it identifies exactly who cast it. (Solana message-signing doesn't enforce a domain separator at the protocol level, so we add thedomainfield ourselves to get that anti-phishing, anti-replay binding.) - Signing happens off-chain via your wallet's
signMessage(an ed25519 message signature, e.g. Phantom): nothing is broadcast, so there is no gas, no fee, no on-chain footprint. - It is not a token approval or a transfer instruction. A signed message is just data — it carries no instruction a token program will ever execute. It cannot move, lock, or access your $LOAM.
- Voting weight = your Patience Score as published by the daily patience engine at a snapshot date announced in advance. Balances are read from the public chain at that snapshot; the holding-history part of the score comes from the engine's openly published daily accumulation — so buying right before a vote earns no extra weight.
- Changed your mind? Sign again — only your latest signature before the close is counted (ordered by the time we receive it, not by a self-declared timestamp).
- After the close, every signature is published openly, alongside the snapshot of balances and holding-age we read at the slot. Anyone can verify each signature against the signer's public key (
ed25519) and re-run the tally. Independently reconstructing the holding history from scratch needs an archival node or indexer (a standard RPC only keeps recent history) — so we publish the snapshot we used as the shared, checkable starting point.
A Signal, Not a Boardroom
These votes are a community signal — the clearest possible read on what holders want, so the LAND Fund moves in the direction the most patient holders choose. They do not create shares, dividends, company voting rights, or any legal claim. $LOAM stays a meme coin: you're shaping a culture, not governing a security.
Everyone, Not Either-Or
You're Not Voting Against Each Other
Most preference votes create winners and losers — solar beats the garden, and half the room walks away with nothing. Not here. Your $LOAM share funds your homestead, and you rank every category instead of picking just one. The vote never crowns one winner; it sets each category's share and order, so everyone gets served. How the buying actually works lives on The Table — here we only cover how you decide.
So when do I say what I want?
Anytime. Your preferences are a standing signal — you set them the day you hold and edit them whenever your plans change. You never have to be online at the right second to count. When a choice is ready to finalize, a short signed snapshot locks it in: continuous intent up front, one signed confirmation at the close. (The buying itself only starts at the 2029 redemption — see The Table.)
Open for Vote
What Holders Decide
Each question is a numbered, dated proposal. As the project and the Fund grow, new ones join the list — and the log at the bottom keeps the full history of what was added, and when.
Early Redemption if We Grow Too Fast
Added 2026-06-08The redemption window opens April 13, 2029. But if the market cap climbs past a certain level before then, holders decide two things: the market-cap threshold that triggers an early opening, and how far forward we move the redemption date.
Move redemption earlier by: [ TBD by vote ]
Add Tiers to the Conversion Rate Table?
Added 2026-06-10The LAND Fund's monthly BTC conversion rate is set by a market-cap tier table that currently tops out at "above $20M → 1.25%". Should Sanctum Elysium add higher tiers — say $50M, $100M and beyond, each with a higher monthly rate — so a runaway market cap converts to Bitcoin even faster? Or is 1.25% the right permanent ceiling? Holders decide whether new tiers are added, where they start, and what rate each one carries.
Tier thresholds & rates: [ TBD by vote ]
Monthly Conversion: One Block or Spread Out?
Added 2026-06-10Each month, the LAND Fund's allocation (the tier rate × the fund's $LOAM balance) is swapped for Bitcoin. Today that swap is designed as one single block on the last day of the month. Holders decide whether to keep it that way — simple, predictable, easy to verify — or to split it into smaller tranches (daily or weekly DCA) spread across the month, softening the price impact of the sale and smoothing the BTC entry price. The month's amount never changes; only the execution style does.
Tranche size & cadence: [ TBD by vote ]
What We Buy — Your Priority Order
Added 2026-06-08 · Reframed 2026-06-10This is the heaviest call the community makes — and the one vote with no explicit "abstain" button. Every holder ranks the four categories below in order of priority, 1 to 4. The aggregated, patience-weighted ranking becomes the Fund's budget split per category — the exact mandate we carry into supplier negotiations. A budget that claims to speak for every holder has to actually hear from every holder, so we count every wallet — but no one is forced to sign: if a wallet truly never signs, it simply follows the aggregated community split by default. Silence delegates your priorities to the community average; it never blocks the table. And remember the section above: this is not one category beating another — every category gets funded; your order decides how much weight each one carries at the negotiating table.
Land — the foundation everything else sits on
Voted in layers: region & country (climate, growing season, political stability, foreign-ownership rules, proximity to members) → the parcel profile (size, price per hectare, year-round road access, water rights, soil quality and slope, legal flags and easements) → cluster vs spread (do members' parcels sit close together for shared infrastructure, or wherever each holder wants?).
The land buyer's checklist → LAND BuyEnergy — power before everything else
Off-grid land is useless without power. Holders vote the system, not just a brand: panel wattage and make, battery chemistry (LiFePO4 vs other) and total kWh, inverter/charge-controller spec, pure off-grid vs hybrid, and how much capacity per household. This is the category that benefits most from the community's bulk-buy leverage.
Off-grid energy details → EnergyGarden & food — the path to real autonomy
Land + power means nothing if you can't eat from it. Decisions here: annual crops vs a perennial food forest, seed and seedling sourcing, soil amendments, greenhouses for cold climates, irrigation tied to the water rights above, and which staples the community standardizes for bulk buying.
Food & soil plan → GardenAnimals — protein, fertility, resilience
Which species earn their keep first — chickens, goats, bees, larger livestock? Holders weigh starter flock/herd size, breeding vs replacement stock, shelter and fencing, feed and veterinary basics, and how animals close the loop with the garden (manure, pest control, grazing).
The symbiotic bestiary → AnimalsNo category cancels another — your ranking sets proportions, not survivors. The detailed sub-votes on exact assets (which brands, which models, which suppliers — e.g., the solar-panel maker, judged on the deal they offer and above all the quality of their product) come later, around Year 2, once this budget split gives us real negotiating leverage. The purchase itself lands at the redemption (April 13, 2029), at the prices we locked — because a six-figure community buy deserves more than a shrug, and because everyone's homestead gets built, not just the loudest.
For the Record
Question Log
- 2026-06-10 Registry re-evaluated. Two questions added — 02 (add tiers above the $20M → 1.25% top of the conversion-rate table?) and 03 (monthly conversion: one block or spread out as DCA?) — and the what-we-buy question reframed as a mandatory ranked-priority ballot (no abstaining; the aggregated ranking sets the budget split per category for supplier negotiations). The registry was also reordered: rules-type questions now lead (01 early redemption, 02, 03) and the priority ranking anchors the list as 04. Supplier picks themselves (e.g., the solar-panel maker — deal offered, product quality) are slated for Year 2.
- 2026-06-08 The Vote launched with two questions: what we buy & in what detail (in parallel, no winner-takes-all), and the early-redemption trigger & how far to move it.
"A meme gathered us. Patience gives each of us a weighted voice. And the big calls? They're yours to shape — signed safely, your tokens never moving."
← Back to LAND Fund
The Memory